4.3 Article

Nonlinear second order electromagnetic gyrokinetic theory for a tokamak plasma

期刊

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6587/acb173

关键词

gyrokinetic theory; tokamak pedestal; spherical tokamak plasma; bootstrap current; kink modes; peeling ballooning modes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The steep plasma pressure gradient at the edge of the high confinement H-mode regime of tokamak operation drives electromagnetic micro-instabilities in the pedestal region. This pressure gradient also influences the stability of ballooning and kink modes and affects confinement in future tokamak power plants. Conventional gyrokinetic theory is extended to incorporate neoclassical effects and provide a model that captures the consequences of large bootstrap current fractions.
The steep plasma pressure gradient that forms at the edge of the high confinement, H-mode regime of tokamak operation provides free energy to drive electromagnetic micro-instabilities that are widely believed to influence the transport processes in this so-called pedestal region. This high pressure gradient also provides a high current density (bootstrap current), known to influence ballooning mode stability and to be important for driving kink modes in the ideal magneto-hydrodynamic plasma model (so-called peeling-ballooning modes). Furthermore, efficient, steady state future tokamak power plants must operate with a large bootstrap current in the core and especially concerning spherical tokamaks, confinement will be influenced by electromagnetic turbulence. To accommodate these important situations, conventional electromagnetic gyrokinetic theory is extended to incorporate neoclassical effects in the equilibrium drives, allowing B-& thetasym; similar to B-0 (B-0 is the confining magnetic field, and B-& thetasym; is its poloidal component). This provides a global gyrokinetic model that self-consistently captures the consequences of large bootstrap current fractions on the equilibrium distribution functions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据