4.7 Article

RAP2.6 enhanced salt stress tolerance by reducing Na plus accumulation and stabilizing the electron transport in Arabidopsis thaliana

期刊

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 195, 期 -, 页码 134-143

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.01.003

关键词

Salt stress; Na plus accumulation; RAP2; 6; PSII; Arabidopsis thaliana

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a transcription factor called RAP2.6 was found to play an important role in the growth and response to salt stress in Arabidopsis. The mutant seedlings of RAP2.6 showed lower sensitivity to salt stress, with higher germination rate and longer root length. Moreover, the mutant plants exhibited higher accumulation of Na+ and lower expression of salt-related genes compared to the wild type.
The transcription factors of the AP2/ERF family are involved in plant growth and development and responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. Here, we found RAP2.6, a transcription factor which belongs to the ERF subfamily, was responsive to salt stress in Arabidopsis. Under salt stress conditions, rap2.6 mutant seedlings were the sensitivity deficiency to salt stress which was reflected in higher germination rate and longer root length compared to the wild type. Also, the expressions of salt-related gene including SOS1, SOS2, SOS3, NHX1, NHX3, NHX5 and HKT1 in rap2.6 mutant seedlings were lower than the wild type under salt stress. rap2.6 mutant adult lacked salt stress tolerance based on the results of the phenotype, survival rates and ion leakage. Compared to wild type, rap2.6 mutant adult accumulated more Na+ in leaves and roots while the salt-related gene expressions were lower. In addition, the photosynthetic electron transport and PSII energy distribution in rap2.6 mutant plant leaves had been more seriously affected under salt stress conditions compared to the wild type. In summary, this study identified essential roles of RAP2.6 in regulating salt stress tolerance in Arabidopsis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据