4.8 Article

Jasmonic acid enhances osmotic stress responses by MYC2-mediated inhibition of protein phosphatase 2C1 and response regulators 26 transcription factor in tomato

期刊

PLANT JOURNAL
卷 113, 期 3, 页码 546-561

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/tpj.16067

关键词

jasmonic acid; SlRR26; stomatal closure; tomato

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The jasmonic acid (JA) signaling pathway is crucial for plants' response to drought stress. JA and other hormones work together to regulate drought response in plants, but the exact molecular mechanism of this synergy is not well understood. This study found that MYC2 directly inhibited the negative regulators of ABA signaling and the cytokinin pathway, SlPP2C1 and SlRR26, respectively. SlRR26 negatively regulated reactive oxygen species levels and stomatal closure through RobhB. Additionally, SlRR26 counteracted JA-mediated stomatal closure, indicating its negative role in the JA-mediated drought response.
The jasmonic acid (JA) signaling pathway is involved in the plant response to drought stress. JA and other hormones synergistically regulate the drought response in plants. However, the molecular mechanism underlying this synergism remains poorly defined. In the present study, transcriptome analyses of guard cells and quantitative PCR experiments revealed that MYC2 negatively regulated the negative regulator of ABA signaling, SlPP2C1, and the type-B response regulator in the cytokinin pathway, SlRR26, and this negative regulation was direct. SlRR26 overexpression reduced drought tolerance in transgenic tomatoes, whereas slrr26(cr) lines were more tolerant to drought. SlRR26 negatively modulated reactive oxygen species levels in stomata and stomatal closure through RobhB. Moreover, SlRR26 overexpression counteracted JA-mediated stomatal closure, suggesting that SlRR26 played a negative role in the JA-mediated drought response. These findings suggest that MYC2 plays a key role in JA-regulated stomatal closure under drought stress by inhibiting SlPP2C1 and SlRR26.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据