4.8 Article

Expanded roles and divergent regulation of FAMA in Brachypodium and Arabidopsis stomatal development

期刊

PLANT CELL
卷 35, 期 2, 页码 756-775

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/plcell/koac341

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It was found that BdFAMA transcription factor plays a crucial role in specifying stomatal guard cell fate in Brachypodium distachyon and can induce the recruitment of subsidiary cells even in the absence of its paralogue BdMUTE. Additionally, proteomic analysis revealed multiple shared interaction partners among these transcription factors in different species.
Stomata, cellular valves found on the surfaces of aerial plant tissues, present a paradigm for studying cell fate and patterning in plants. A highly conserved core set of related basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors regulates stomatal development across diverse species. We characterized BdFAMA in the temperate grass Brachypodium distachyon and found this late-acting transcription factor was necessary and sufficient for specifying stomatal guard cell fate, and unexpectedly, could also induce the recruitment of subsidiary cells in the absence of its paralogue, BdMUTE. The overlap in function is paralleled by an overlap in expression pattern and by unique regulatory relationships between BdMUTE and BdFAMA. To better appreciate the relationships among the Brachypodium stomatal bHLHs, we used in vivo proteomics in developing leaves and found evidence for multiple shared interaction partners. We reexamined the roles of these genes in Arabidopsis thaliana by testing genetic sufficiency within and across species, and found that while BdFAMA and AtFAMA can rescue stomatal production in Arabidopsis fama and mute mutants, only AtFAMA can specify Brassica-specific myrosin idioblasts. Taken together, our findings refine the current models of stomatal bHLH function and regulatory feedback among paralogues within grasses as well as across the monocot/dicot divide.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据