4.7 Article

Turbulence characteristics and mixing properties of gravity currents over complex topography

期刊

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
卷 35, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0132830

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding gravity currents developing on complex topography is crucial for estimating near ground fluxes in oceanic and atmospheric circulation. Experimental results show the dependence of mean flow, turbulence characteristics, and mixing properties of gravity currents on topography. These characteristics are compared with field measurements of katabatic winds, revealing differences in mean flow structure but comparable mixing lengths and eddy coefficients.
Understanding gravity currents developing on complex topography, which involve turbulence and mixing processes on a wide range of spatial and temporal scales, is of importance for estimating near ground fluxes in oceanic and atmospheric circulation. We present experimental results, based on high resolution velocity and density measurements, of constant upstream buoyancy supply gravity currents flowing from a horizontal boundary onto a tangent hyperbolic shaped slope. The mean flow, turbulence characteristics, and mixing properties, the latter expressed in terms of mixing lengths and eddy coefficients, are determined, highlighting their dependency on topography. These mean flow and mixing characteristics are compared with the field measurements in katabatic winds by Charrondiere et al. [Mean flow structure of katabatic winds and turbulent mixing properties, J. Fluid Mech. 941, A11 (2022)], which are gravity flows that develop over sloping terrain due to radiative cooling at the surface. The results obtained show that the mean katabatic flow structure is substantially different from that of the upstream buoyancy supply gravity current. However interestingly, dimensionless mixing lengths and eddy coefficients compare well despite the difference in the mean flow structure and a two order of magnitude difference in the Reynolds number.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据