4.7 Article

Electrical conductivity of the quark-gluon plasma from the low energy limit of photon and dilepton spectra

期刊

PHYSICS LETTERS B
卷 837, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137647

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fluid dynamic considerations are used to determine the electric current spectral density in the regime of small energies and momenta. The spectral density in this regime is parameterized by the electric conductivity, the charge susceptibility, and the relaxation time for the electric current, which is needed for relativistic causality. Experimentally, the spectral function can be accessed through the production rates of photons and dileptons in the expanding quark-gluon plasma. We discuss how experiments can constrain the electrical conductivity and associated relaxation time of the quark-gluon plasma.
Fluid dynamic considerations are used to determine the electric current spectral density in the regime of small energies and momenta. The spectral density in this regime is parameterized by the electric conductivity, the charge susceptibility, and the relaxation time for the electric current, which is needed for relativistic causality. Experimentally, the spectral function can be accessed through the production rates of photons and dileptons in the expanding quark-gluon plasma. We use fluid dynamic simulations of high energy nuclear collisions, together with the transport limit of the spectral density, to obtain photon and dielectron spectra for different values of the conductivity and relaxation times. The yields of photon and dileptons produced in the plasma are compared to the background from decays of short-lived hadrons. We discuss how experiments can constrain the electrical conductivity and associated relaxation time of the quark-gluon plasma.(c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funded by SCOAP3.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据