4.8 Article

Quasi-SU(3) Coupling Induced Oblate-Prolate Shape Phase Transition in the Casten Triangle

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 130, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.052501

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The shapes and shape evolution in the mass-130 region have been extensively studied in nuclear physics. By using the shell model Hamiltonian and the Hartree-Fock-Bogolyubov plus generator coordinate method, we have identified the quasi-SU(3) couplings between protons and neutrons, which play a significant role in the shape evolution and phase transition.
Shapes and shape evolution in the mass-130 region, including the Te, Xe, and Ba isotopes, have long been a focus of discussion in nuclear physics. This mass region consists of complex many-body systems that can behave in astonishingly simple and regular ways, as classified in the Casten symmetry triangle. By applying the shell model Hamiltonian proposed recently, we carry out calculations using the Hartree-Fock-Bogolyubov plus generator coordinate method, in the large model space containing the (1g(9/2), 1g(7/2), 2d(5/2), 2d(3/2), 3s(1/2), 1h(11/2), 2f(7/2)) orbits. Based on good reproduction of the experimentally known energy levels, spectroscopic quadrupole moments, and E2 transition probabilities, we identify the quasi-SU(3) couplings across the N = 50 and 82 shell gaps, which play a role in driving shape evolution and phase transition discussed in the extended Casten triangle. Specifically, we demonstrate that the quasi-SU(3) coupling mechanism in the proton partner orbits (1g(9/2), 2d(5/2)) tends to drive the system to be more. soft, and that in the neutron partner orbits (1h(11/2), 2f(7/2)) are responsible for the oblate-to-prolate shape phase transition. With an emphasis on discussing spectroscopic quadrupole moments, our Letter uncovers hidden symmetries from the vast shell-model configurations and adds microscopical insights into the empirical symmetry triangle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据