4.8 Article

Quantum Metrology of Noisy Spreading Channels

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 129, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.240503

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, National Quantum Information Science Research Centers, Superconducting Quantum Materials and Systems Center (SQMS) [DE-AC02-07CH11359]
  2. National Science Center (Poland) [2020/37/B/ST2/02134]
  3. Foundation for Polish Science (FNP) via the START scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides an optimal measurement strategy for a class of noisy channels that reduce to the identity channel for a specific parameter value. A physically relevant example of estimating displacement in the presence of phase randomizing noise is provided. Surprisingly, this noise does not affect the effectiveness of the optimal measurement. Squeezed vacuum probe field is the optimal strategy for small displacement, while homodyne detection becomes useless in the limit of small displacements.
We provide the optimal measurement strategy for a class of noisy channels that reduce to the identity channel for a specific value of a parameter (spreading channels). We provide an example that is physically relevant: the estimation of the absolute value of the displacement in the presence of phase randomizing noise. Surprisingly, this noise does not affect the effectiveness of the optimal measurement. We show that, for small displacement, a squeezed vacuum probe field is optimal among strategies with same average energy. A squeezer followed by photodetection is the optimal detection strategy that attains the quantum Fisher information, whereas the customarily used homodyne detection becomes useless in the limit of small displacements, due to the same effect that gives Rayleigh's curse in optical superresolution. There is a quantum advantage: a squeezed or a Fock state with N average photons allow to asymptotically estimate the parameter with a V better precision than classical states with same energy. ffiffiffiN

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据