4.8 Article

Aharonov-Bohm Caging and Inverse Anderson Transition in Ultracold Atoms

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 129, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.220403

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFA0307200, 2022YFA1404203]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U21A20437, 12074337]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LR21A040002]
  4. Zhejiang Province Plan for Science and Technology [2020C01019]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2021FZZX001-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aharonov-Bohm (AB) caging is a special flat-band localization mechanism that has attracted great interest in the study of quantum transport in flatband systems. This system exhibits unique behavior due to the interplay between geometric frustration, disorder, and correlations.
Aharonov-Bohm (AB) caging, a special flat-band localization mechanism, has spurred great interest in different areas of physics. AB caging can be harnessed to explore the rich and exotic physics of quantum transport in flatband systems, where geometric frustration, disorder, and correlations act in a synergetic and distinct way than that in ordinary dispersive band systems. In contrast to the ordinary Anderson localization, where disorder induces localization and prevents transport, in flat band systems disorder can induce mobility, a phenomenon dubbed inverse Anderson transition. Here, we report on the experimental realization of the AB cage using a synthetic lattice in the momentum space of ultracold atoms with tailored gauge fields, and demonstrate the geometric localization due to the flat band and the inverse Anderson transition when correlated binary disorder is added to the system. Our experimental platform in a many-body environment provides a fascinating quantum simulator where the interplay between engineered gauge fields, localization, and topological properties of flat band systems can be finely explored.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据