4.8 Article

Pressure Stabilized Lithium-Aluminum Compounds with BothSuperconducting and Superionic Behaviors br

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 129, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.246403

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2022YFA1403201]
  2. National NaturalScience Foundation of China [12125404, 11974162, 11834006]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we identified stable Li-Al compounds with electride behavior under high pressure using crystal structure predictions and first-principle calculations combined with machine learning. Some of these compounds exhibited characteristics of a two-dimensional electron gas. We found that Li6Al at 150 GPa has a superconducting transition temperature of around 29 K and enters a superionic state at a high temperature and wide pressure range.
Superconducting and superionic behaviors have physically intriguing dynamic properties of electronsand ions, respectively, both of which are conceptually important and have great potential for practicalapplications. Whether these two phenomena can appear in the same system is an interesting and importantquestion. Here, using crystal structure predictions and first-principle calculations combined with machinelearning, we identify several stable Li-Al compounds with electride behavior under high pressure, and wefind that the electronic density of states of some of the compounds has characteristics of the two-dimensional electron gas. Among them, we estimate that Li6Al at 150 GPa has a superconducting transitiontemperature of around 29 K and enters a superionic state at a high temperature and wide pressure range. Thediffusion in Li6Al is found to be affected by an electride and attributed to the atomic collective motion. Ourresults indicate that alkali metal alloys can be effective platforms to study the abundant physical propertiesand their manipulation with pressure and temperature

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据