4.6 Review

A mini review of the recent progress of electrode materials for low-temperature solid oxide fuel cells

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 25, 期 8, 页码 5926-5941

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2cp05133h

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review summarizes recent developments of low-temperature solid oxide fuel cell (LT-SOFC) electrodes, including anode and cathode materials. For anode improvement, internal structure design, fine anode structure, reforming layer addition, and in situ exsolution techniques are introduced. For cathode, perovskite-type materials and their composition optimization are discussed, along with nanostructure assembly and 3D morphology design. Several research directions for future studies are also suggested.
Lowering the operating temperature (450-650 degrees C) of solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) faces the intrinsic challenge of sluggish electrode reaction kinetics in the low temperature (LT) range. To accelerate the electrode reaction rate, many efforts have been put into the optimization of electrode composition and morphology. In this review, we have summarized recent developments of LT-SOFC electrodes, including anode and cathode materials. For anode performance improvement, the internal structure design, fine anode structure, reforming layer addition, and in situ exsolution techniques are introduced and their related functionalities are also explained, respectively. While for the cathode, we focus on the perovskite-type materials because of their superior catalytic performance and relatively good stability. The optimization of perovskite composition, including A site alkali or alkali-earth metal doping and B site variable-valence transition metal doping, is discussed in detail based on their effects on oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). Besides, nanostructure assembly and 3D morphology design are also recent hotspots for cathode research. Finally, we also propose several research directions in this field, hoping to provide guidelines for future research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据