4.6 Article

S-functionalized 2D V2B as a promising anode material for rechargeable lithium ion batteries

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 25, 期 5, 页码 4015-4024

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2cp05477a

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, S-functionalized V2B was investigated as an electrode material for Li/Na/K ion batteries using first-principles calculations. The results showed that V2BS2 has good electrical conductivity, dynamic and thermal stability, high theoretical specific capacity, and low open circuit voltage, making it a promising electrode material for rechargeable metal ion batteries.
The development of novel high specific capacity anode materials is urgently needed for rechargeable metal ion batteries. Herein, S-functionalized V2B as the electrode material for Li/Na/K ion batteries are comprehensively investigated using first-principles calculations. Specifically, V2BS2 was verified with good electrical conductivity via band structure and density of states calculations. Phonon dispersion and ab initio molecular dynamic simulations were performed and confirmed the dynamic and thermal stability of V2BS2. The use of V2BS2 with a high theoretical specific capacity of 606 mA h g(-1) for lithium ion batteries (LIBs) due to the bilayer adsorption of Li atoms is encouraging, which is attributed to the double empty orbitals of the S atoms and small lattice mismatch (1.5%) between the Li layers and substrate. Furthermore, dendrite formation would be well prohibited and safety issues for battery operation would be ensured for V2BS2 as electrode materials because of the low open circuit voltage with 0.37 V. The high charge/discharge rate for LIBs is also achievable owing to the high mobility of adatoms on the surface of V2BS2. Our work not only finds use as a promising material for the field of energy storage, but also provides constructive design strategies for developing high performance anode materials for rechargeable metal ion batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据