4.6 Article

Magnetic field effects on radical pair reactions: estimation of B1/2 for flavin-tryptophan radical pairs in cryptochromes

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 25, 期 2, 页码 975-982

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2cp03793a

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study estimates the hyperfine-only values of the half-field parameter, B-1/2, for the flavin-tryptophan radical pair and makes several important findings regarding its characteristics under different conditions. The researchers also highlight the limitations of the widely used expression for B-1/2 in the context of magnetoreception.
Magnetic field effects on the yields of radical pair reactions are often characterised by the half-field parameter, B-1/2, which encodes useful information on spin relaxation, radical recombination kinetics and electron-electron couplings as well as electron-nuclear hyperfine interactions. Here we use a variety of spin dynamics simulation methods to estimate the hyperfine-only values of B-1/2 for the flavin-tryptophan radical pair, [FAD(-) TrpH(+)], thought to be the detector in the magnetic compass sense of migratory songbirds. The main findings are: (a) in the absence of fast recombination and spin relaxation, [FAD(-) TrpH(+)] radical pairs in solution and in the putative magnetoreceptor protein, cryptochrome, have B-1/2 approximate to 1.89 mT and 2.46 mT, respectively. (b) The widely used expression for B-1/2 due to Weller et al. (Chem. Phys. Lett, 1983, 96, 24-27) is only applicable to small, short-lived (similar to 5 ns), rapidly tumbling radical pairs in solution, and is quantitatively unreliable in the context of magnetoreception. (c) In the absence of molecular tumbling, the low-field effect for [FAD(-) TrpH(+)] is predicted to be abolished by the anisotropic components of the hyperfine interactions. Armed with the 2.46 mT base value for cryptochrome, measurements of B-1/2 can be used to understand the impact of spin relaxation on its performance as a magnetic compass sensor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据