4.6 Article

Strain engineering of Li+ ion migration in olivine phosphate cathode materials LiMPO4 (M = Mn, Fe, Co) and (LiFePO4)n(LiMnPO4)m superlattices

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 25, 期 8, 页码 6142-6152

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2cp05241e

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, atomic simulations were conducted to investigate the effects of lattice strains on the Li+ ion migration energy barrier in olivine phosphates. It was found that biaxial tensile strain perpendicular to the migration path is most beneficial in reducing the energy barrier of Li+ ions. SL3 + 1 and SL1 + 3 were identified as the most favorable paths for Li+ ion migration. This work provides valuable insights for cathode materials and battery design.
The olivine phosphate family has been widely utilized as cathode materials for high-performance lithium-ion batteries. However, limited energy density and poor rate performance caused by low electronic and ionic conductivities are the main obstacles that need to be overcome for their widespread application. In this work, atomic simulations have been performed to study the effects of lattice strains on the Li+ ion migration energy barrier in olivine phosphates LiMPO4 (M = Mn, Fe, Co) and (LiFePO4)(n)(LiMnPO4)(m) superlattices (SLs). The (LiFePO4)(n)(LiMnPO4)(m) superlattices include three ratios of LFP/LMP, namely SL3 + 1, SL1 + 1 and SL1 + 3, each of which is along three typical (100), (010) and (001) orientations. We mainly discuss two migration paths of Li+ ions: the low-energy path A channel parallel to the b-axis and the medium-energy path B channel parallel to the c-axis. It is found that the biaxial tensile strain perpendicular to the migration path is most beneficial to reduce the migration energy barrier of Li+ ions, and the strain on the b-axis has a dominant effect on the energy barrier of Li+ ion migration. For path A, SL3 + 1 alternating periodically along the (010) orientation can obtain the lowest Li ion migration energy barrier. For path B, SL1 + 3 is the most favorable for Li+ ion migration, and there is no significant difference among the three orientations. Our work provides reference values for cathode materials and battery design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据