4.6 Article

Influence of oxidation on the magnetism of small Co oxide clusters probed by Stern-Gerlach deflection

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 25, 期 1, 页码 171-182

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2cp05202d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Research Foundation Flanders [G0A0519N]
  2. KU Leuven Research Council [C14/18/073, C14/22/103]
  3. FWO
  4. Flemish Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report on the magnetic properties of small neutral suboxide ConOm clusters and found that cobalt atoms couple ferromagnetically both in pure cobalt clusters and their oxidized counterparts. The magnetic moment per cobalt atom is enhanced in the oxide clusters compared to pure cobalt clusters and generally increases with the oxygen content. Density functional theory calculations attribute the effect of oxidation on the magnetic response of the clusters to electron transfer from cobalt 3d and 4s valence orbitals to oxygen.
We report on the magnetic properties of small neutral suboxide ConOm (n = 5-18 and m = 0-10, m <= n) clusters produced by laser vaporisation and gas aggregation. Their magnetism is probed experimentally by means of Stern-Gerlach magnetic deflection. The results imply that the cobalt atoms couple ferromagnetically not only in pure Co-n clusters, as known from previous investigations, but also in their oxidized counterparts. It was found that the magnetic moment per cobalt atom is mostly enhanced in the oxide clusters with respect to the pure cobalt clusters and generally increases with the oxygen content in the studied composition range. The spin magnetism of selected clusters is also investigated by density functional theory (DFT) calculations. The computations allow to attribute the effect of oxidation on the magnetic response of the ConOm clusters to electron transfer from the cobalt 3d and 4s valence orbitals to oxygen. The cobalt 3d levels preferentially donate electrons of minority spin, but both spin orientations are involved in the transfer of cobalt 4s electrons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据