4.6 Article

Surface charge regulation using classical density functional theory: the effect of divalent potential determining ions

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 25, 期 2, 页码 1023-1031

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2cp03644d

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the role of divalent ions in charge regulation by coupling charge regulation with classical density functional theory (DFT). It is found that the size of divalent ions has significant consequences on surface charge density and should not be neglected. At low concentrations, ion correlations play a second-order but non-negligible role; at high concentrations, ion correlations play a dominant role by creating charge inversion.
The charge regulation approach has been used to describe the charge of surfaces susceptible to the presence of protons and other ions. Conventionally, this model is used with the Poisson-Boltzmann equation, which generally neglects the finite size of the ions and the electrostatic correlations. Recently, progress has been made by coupling charge regulation with classical density functional theory (DFT), which explicitly includes these correlations. However, little is known about charge regulation at surfaces with both acid-base equilibria and complexation with multivalent ions. The main purpose of this work is to investigate the role divalent ions play in charge regulation. Using DFT, we show that the size of the divalent ion has significant consequences on the surface charge density and it should not be neglected. For the surface reactions investigated, the larger the size of the divalent cation, the greater the charge on the surface due to higher divalent concentration there. At low divalent concentration, the ion correlations play a second-order but non-negligible role; using Poisson-Boltzmann theory with point ions cannot recover the DFT surface charge. At high concentrations, ion correlations play a dominant role by creating charge inversion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据