4.6 Article

Theoretical and computational study of a partially coherent laser beam in a marine environment

期刊

PHYSICA SCRIPTA
卷 98, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1402-4896/acaa70

关键词

partially coherent Generalized Flattened Hermite-Cosh-Gaussian; maritime atmospheric turbulence; cross-spectral density function; beam width

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The propagation formula and beam width expression of a partially coherent Generalized Flattened Hermite-Cosh-Gaussian (GFHChG) beam in maritime atmospheric turbulence is derived and investigated in this study. The numerical results show that the profile shape of the analyzed beam depends on the turbulence and beam parameters, and it exhibits good turbulence resistance with small wavelength and waist width values.
The propagation formula of a partially coherent Generalized Flattened Hermite-Cosh-Gaussian (GFHChG) beam in maritime atmospheric turbulence is derived with the help of the extended Huygens-Fresnel principle. In addition, the analytical expression for the beam width of a partially coherent GFHChG beam in the considered environment is investigated. From the numerical results based on the analytical formulae, we find that the analyzed beam can take different shapes of the profile, depending on the turbulence and beam parameters. And also, it can significantly resist turbulence with small wavelength and waist width values. On the other hand, when the medium becomes turbulent, the beam loses its characteristics and its resistance to fluctuations. Furthermore, the results reveal that the beam spreads more rapidly with the increase of the strength of turbulence, the outer scale size, and the decrease of the inner scale size. We should mention that the results gained represent a general form of numerous partially coherent laser beams such as Generalized Flattened Hermite Gaussian, Generalized Flattened Cosh-Gaussian, Hermite-Cosh-Gaussian, Cosh-Gaussian, Hermite-Gaussian and Gaussian Schell model beams.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据