4.4 Article

Field Study and Evaluation of KrCl* Far UV-C Device Capability for Inactivation of Phi6 Bacteriophage

期刊

PHOTOCHEMISTRY AND PHOTOBIOLOGY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/php.13767

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Far UV-C is an effective disinfection method that can be used in occupied areas. The use of filtered KrCl* excimer lamps emitting light at 222 nm has been proven to be safe for human exposure and can effectively disinfect pathogens. Laboratory and field testing showed that this method can achieve complete inactivation of viruses in a short exposure time. The study demonstrates the applicability and deployment of Far UV-C for pathogen reduction and provides valuable insights for its implementation in human-occupied environments.
Far UV-C is an effective disinfection method that can be deployed in occupied areas. Commercially available Krypton Chloride (KrCl*) excimer lamps filtered to emit at 222 nm are effective in disinfecting pathogens and safe for human exposure up to an allowable threshold exposure, which is much longer than for conventional UV lamps emitting at 254 nm. Laboratory and controlled field testing of a filtered KrCl* excimer lamp for disinfection of a virus suspended in a thin film aqueous solution in an occupied office setting was conducted. Complete inactivation of almost 6 log (99.9999%) of Phi6 bacteriophage virus was achieved in similar to 20 min of exposure time in a field setting, equivalent to a dose of about 10 mJ cm(-2). The Phi6 inactivation rate constant for the field test results were not statistically different from laboratory values (P > 0.05, paired t-test). When positioned at 1 m distance from possible human exposure, this device can be used safely for almost 4.5 h of continuous direct exposure without any acute or long-term adverse health effects. This study illustrates the applicability and deployment of Far UV-C for pathogen reduction and can help in decision making for implementation of Far UV-C for disinfection in human-occupied environments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据