4.7 Article

MUC1 promotes glioblastoma progression and TMZ resistance by stabilizing EGFRvIII

期刊

PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH
卷 187, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2022.106606

关键词

Epidermal growth factor receptor variant III; Mucin 1-C; Glioblastoma; NF-kappa B; EPIC-1027

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Based on CRISPR-Cas9 library screening, we found that MUC1-C is essential for EGFRvIII glioma cell survival and TMZ resistance. By inhibiting the NF-kappa B pathway, EPIC-1027 disrupts the EGFRvIII-MUC1-C positive feedback loop, inhibits glioma progression, and increases sensitivity to TMZ.
Epidermal growth factor receptor variant III (EGFRvIII) is a mutant isoform of EGFR with a deletion of exons 2-7 making it insensitive to EGF stimulation and downstream signal constitutive activation. However, the mechanism underlying the stability of EGFRvIII remains unclear. Based on CRISPR-Cas9 library screening, we found that mucin1 (MUC1) is essential for EGFRvIII glioma cell survival and temozolomide (TMZ) resistance. We revealed that MUC1-C was upregulated in EGFRvIII-positive cells, where it enhanced the stability of EGFRvIII. Knockdown of MUC1-C increased the colocalization of EGFRvIII and lysosomes. Upregulation of MUC1 occurred in an NF-kappa B dependent manner, and inhibition of the NF-kappa B pathway could interrupt the EGFRvIII-MUC1 feedback loop by inhibiting MUC1-C. In a previous report, we identified AC1Q3QWB (AQB), a small molecule that could inhibit the phosphorylation of NF-kappa B. By screening the structural analogs of AQB, we obtained EPIC 1027, which could inhibit the NF-kappa B pathway more effectively. EPIC-1027 disrupted the EGFRvIII-MUC1-C positive feedback loop in vitro and in vivo, inhibited glioma progression, and promoted sensitization to TMZ. In conclusion, we revealed the pivotal role of MUC1-C in stabilizing EGFRvIII in glioblastoma (GBM) and identified a small molecule, EPIC-1027, with great potential in GBM treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据