4.4 Article

Findings from a Roundtable Discussion with US Stakeholders on Valuation of the EQ-5D-Y-3L

相关参考文献

注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Article Economics

Accounting for Unobservable Preference Heterogeneity and Evaluating Alternative Anchoring Approaches to Estimate Country-Specific EQ-5D-Y Value Sets: A Case Study Using Spanish Preference Data

Juan M. Ramos-Goni et al.

Summary: This study aims to explore modeling strategies for generating EQ-5D-Y value sets and produce a Spanish value set. The results suggest that hybrid models using all available C-TTO observations produce a narrower range of values than the pits state anchoring approach. The international EQ-5D-Y valuation protocol should be updated to include different health states for the C-TTO experiment if alternative anchoring approaches are desired.

VALUE IN HEALTH (2022)

Article Economics

Why Do Adults Value EQ-5D-Y-3L Health States Differently for Themselves Than for Children and Adolescents: A Think-Aloud Study

Vivian Reckers-Droog et al.

Summary: This study examines the reasons underlying the differences in adults' health-state preferences for themselves, a 10-year-old child, and 15-year-old adolescent. The results indicate that these differences largely result from differences in thoughts about nonhealth-related factors.

VALUE IN HEALTH (2022)

Article Economics

EQ-5D-Y Value Set for Germany

Simone Kreimeier et al.

Summary: This study developed a German EQ-5D-Y value set using the EQ-5D-Y valuation protocol and examined the differences in preferences for youth health between parents and non-parents. The findings provide important data for economic evaluations of pediatric healthcare interventions.

PHARMACOECONOMICS (2022)

Article Economics

Exploration of the Reasons Why Health State Valuation Differs for Children Compared With Adults: A Mixed Methods Approach

Sarah Dewilde et al.

Summary: This study investigates the reasons why child health states are valued differently compared to adults. The qualitative results identified five themes regarding child and adult valuation, including intergenerational responsibility and dependency, the importance of staying alive, awareness of poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and ability to make decisions, coping ability, and the practical organization of care. The findings confirm that child-specific value sets are needed to adequately assess pediatric treatments.

VALUE IN HEALTH (2022)

Article Economics

Does Changing the Age of a Child to be Considered in 3-Level Version of EQ-5D-Y Discrete Choice Experiment-Based Valuation Studies Affect Health Preferences?

Juan M. Ramos-Goni et al.

Summary: This study aimed to investigate the impact of varying the age of the child on the EQ-5D-Y-3L values. The results showed no significant differences between perspectives in the United States. However, in the United Kingdom, there were differences between the own perspective and the perspective of 5-7 years old children, as well as between the perspective of 5-7 years old children and the perspective of 8-10 years old children.

VALUE IN HEALTH (2022)

Editorial Material Economics

Valuing Child Health Isn't Child's Play Comment

Nancy J. Devlin

VALUE IN HEALTH (2022)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Valuing EQ-5D-Y: the current state of play

N. Devlin et al.

Summary: This article reviews the experience of using the EQ-5D-Y valuation protocol, highlighting early learnings and areas where further research is needed. Priority research areas include testing alternative methods for anchoring DCE data, exploring adolescents' preferences, and examining the scale differences between EQ-5D-Y and adult EQ-5D states and their implications for HTA.

HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES (2022)

Article Economics

A Value Set for the EQ-5D-Y-3L in the Netherlands

Bram Roudijk et al.

Summary: This study collected preferences for the child-friendly EQ-5D version, EQ-5D-Y-3L, using composite time trade-off and discrete choice experiment methods. The study generated a Dutch value set for EQ-5D-Y-3L, which can be used in economic evaluations of healthcare interventions for paediatric populations. The results showed that pain/discomfort had the highest weight, followed by feeling worried, sad or unhappy, usual activities, mobility, and self-care.

PHARMACOECONOMICS (2022)

Article Economics

Value Set for the EQ-5D-Y-3L in Hungary

Fanni Rencz et al.

Summary: This study aimed to develop a national value set of the EQ-5D-Y-3L for Hungary. The results showed that the severity of different domains had different impacts on utilities, with pain or discomfort being the most important factor. The findings of this study are important for evaluating the cost utility of health technologies for children and adolescents in Hungary.

PHARMACOECONOMICS (2022)

Article Economics

EQ-5D-Y Value Set for Slovenia

Valentina Prevolnik Rupel et al.

Summary: This study aimed to obtain adult preferences towards EQ-5D-Y health states in Slovenia, following the international valuation protocol EQ-5D-Y-3L. The study provided the first EQ-5D-Y value set in the world, addressing an important research gap.

PHARMACOECONOMICS (2021)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Valuation Survey of EQ-5D-Y Based on the International Common Protocol: Development of a Value Set in Japan

Takeru Shiroiwa et al.

Summary: This study developed the first EQ-5D-Y value set for converting responses to index values. Respondents valued children's health states using composite time tradeoff and a discrete choice experiment. Mental function domains were found to have higher value in assessing children's health status, and a value set for EQ-5D-Y was successfully constructed by converting latent DCE values to a utility scale.

MEDICAL DECISION MAKING (2021)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Valuing EQ-5D-Y-3L Health States Using a Discrete Choice Experiment: Do Adult and Adolescent Preferences Differ?

David J. Mott et al.

Summary: This study compared the preferences of adults and adolescents for EQ-5D-Y-3L health states and found that pain/discomfort was the most important for both samples. Adolescents gave less weight to usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression compared to adults. The results suggest potential differences in preferences between adolescents and adults when evaluating children's health.

MEDICAL DECISION MAKING (2021)

Article Economics

Think of the Children: A Discussion of the Rationale for and Implications of the Perspective Used for EQ-5D-Y Health State Valuation

Stefan A. Lipman et al.

Summary: This article discusses the rationale for applying a child perspective for EQ-5D-Y health state valuation, highlighting potential differences in utilities and implications for reimbursement decisions in economic evaluations of health technologies for children and adolescents. Further research is needed to determine the normative and empirical justification for this change in perspective.

VALUE IN HEALTH (2021)

Article Economics

Self vs. other, child vs. adult. An experimental comparison of valuation perspectives for valuation of EQ-5D-Y-3L health states

S. A. Lipman et al.

Summary: The study surveyed 205 students to evaluate EQ-5D-Y-3L health states from different perspectives, finding that different perspectives had an impact on the outcomes, precision, and quality of the evaluation.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS (2021)

Article Economics

International Valuation Protocol for the EQ-5D-Y-3L

Juan M. Ramos-Goni et al.

PHARMACOECONOMICS (2020)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Development of the EQ-5D-Y: a child-friendly version of the EQ-5D

Nora Wille et al.

QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2010)