4.5 Article

Automatic reservoir model identification using syntactic pattern recognition in well test interpretation

期刊

PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10916466.2022.2143808

关键词

Model identification; syntactic pattern recognition; TDS technology; well test analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes an automated framework for well test model identification using syntactic pattern recognition. The framework consists of six steps and can effectively address the non-uniqueness of different reservoir models. The findings of this study are important for better understanding the process of well test experts in completing the task of model identification.
Well test model identification is a challenging task due to the numerous types of well test interpretation models and the non-uniqueness of pressure responses generated by different reservoir models. An automated framework is crucial to aid in the identification of well test interpretation models. Since the identification of well test interpretation relies primarily on the various flow regimes appeared on different diagnostic plots. A novel approach is proposed for the well test model identification from the pressure transient test data using the syntactic pattern recognition in this study. In this study, the identification process of well test interpretation model is divided into six steps: preprocessing, feature primitive extraction, curve shape tracking, flow regime division, model preliminary inference, and model final validation incorporating TDS technology. The automatic identification framework developed with this method has been able to identify a variety of complex well test interpretation models correctly, and the non-uniqueness of model results can be well resolved by syntactic pattern recognition combined with TDS technology. In general, the findings of this study can help for better understanding of the process by which well test expert completes the task of model identification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据