4.6 Article

Tetravalent Ce in the Nitrate-Decorated Hexanuclear Cluster [Ce6(μ3-O)4(μ3-OH)4]12+: A Structural End Point for Ceria Nanoparticles

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 120, 期 10, 页码 5810-5818

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b00644

关键词

-

资金

  1. UChicago Argonne, LLC (Argonne National Laboratory)
  2. U.S. Department of Energy
  3. BES Heavy Elements Program [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We describe the synthesis and characterization of three glycine-stabilized hexanuclear Cely cluster compounds, each containing the [Ce-6(mu(3)-O)(4)(mu(3)-OH)(4)](12+) core structure. Crystallized from aqueous nitrate solutions with pH < 0, the core cluster structures exhibit variable decoration by nitrate, glycine, and water ligands depending on solution conditions, where increased nitrate and glycine decoration of the cluster core was observed for crystals synthesized at high Ce and nitrate concentrations. No other crystalline products were observed using this synthetic route. In addition to confirming the tetravalent oxidation state of cerium in one of the reported clusters, cyclic voltammetry also indicates that Ce-IV is reduced at similar to+0.60 V vs Ag/AgCl (3 M NaCl), which is significantly less than the standard electrode potential. This large decrease in the Ce-IV/Ce-III reduction potential suggests that Ce-IV is significantly stabilized relative to Ce-III within the examined cluster. These compounds are discussed in terms of their importance as small, end member, ceric oxide nanoparticles. Single-crystal structural solutions, together with voltammetry and electrolysis data, permit the decoupling of Ce-III defects and substoichiometry. In addition, Ce-Ce distances can be used to determine an effective CeO2-x lattice constant, providing a simple method for comparing literature descriptions. The results are discussed in terms of their potential implications for the mechanisms by which nanoparticle ceria serve as catalysts and oxygen-storage materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据