4.7 Article

Collaborative Learning with Unreliability Adaptation for Semi-Supervised Image Classification

期刊

PATTERN RECOGNITION
卷 133, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2022.109032

关键词

Semi-supervised learning; Image classification; Unreliability adaptation; Collaborative learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a collaborative learning model, in which multiple networks learn collaboratively by adapting their predictions. By introducing adaptation modules and consistency regularization, the training performance and stability among networks can be improved.
Constructing training goals for unlabeled data is crucial for image classification in the semi-supervised setting. Consistency regularization typically encourages a model to produce consistent predictions with the given training goals, while unreliability adaptation aims to learn the transition probabilities from model predictions to training goals, instead of enforcing their consistency. In this paper, we present a model of Collaborative learning with Unreliability Adaptation (CoUA), in which multiple constituent networks collaboratively learn with each other by adapting their predictions. Toward this end, an additional adaptation module is incorporated into each network to learn a transition probability from its own prediction to that of the paired network. Therefore, the networks can exchange training experience, without being overly sensitive to the unreliability of predictions. To further enhance the collaborative learning, each network is encouraged to produce consistent predictions with the consensus results, while being resistant to the adversarial perturbations against others. Therefore, the networks are able to mutually reinforce each other. We perform extensive experiments on multiple image classification benchmarks to verify the superiority of the co-adaptation based collaborative learning mechanism. (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据