4.6 Article

Stark Spectroscopy of Absorption and Emission of Indoline Sensitizers: A Correlation with the Performance of Photovoltaic Cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 120, 期 46, 页码 26206-26216

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b08531

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Chiao Tung University
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology
  3. MOE-ATU program of Taiwan
  4. Research Institute for Electronic Science at Hokkaido University, Japan
  5. MEXT [16H04091]
  6. Institute for Quantum Chemical Exploration (IQCE)
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H04091] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electric field effects on photoexcitation dynamics and electronic properties of highly efficient indoline sensitizers, DN488, D205, and DN182, embedded in PMMA films have been examined by using electroabsorption (E-A) and electrophotoluminescence (E-PL) spectroscopic techniques and time-resolved photoluminescence (PL) decay measurements in the presence of electric fields. Photovoltaic performances have been also measured for devices constructed using these sensitizers. Then, field-induced quenching of PL and field-induced change in PL decay profile were observed, and it was found that these field effects, which depend on the sensitizers investigated herein, are well correlated with the trend of power conversion efficiencies of the corresponding photovoltaic cells. Electric dipole moment and molecular polarizability of these sensitizers both in the ground state (S-0) and in the excited state have been calculated at the level of B3LYP/6-31G(d), and the differencesof these physical parameters between So and excited state thus obtained have been compared with the ones determined from the E-A and E-PL spectra. The present study of Stark spectroscopy of indoline dyes provides new insights for the exciton dissociation property and carrier mobility of organic dyes, which are important factors to understand the operation mechanism in dye-sensitized solar cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据