4.5 Article

If not home, where? Implementing an innovative model of care as an alternative place of care & death for patients living in an area of high socio-economic deprivation. Short-report on opening a long-term palliative care unit

期刊

PALLIATIVE MEDICINE
卷 37, 期 4, 页码 652-656

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/02692163221133984

关键词

Palliative care; hospices; health inequalities; health inequities; social inequities; advance care planning; long term care; death

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The establishment of the long-term palliative care unit in Hartlepool provides a valuable alternative care model for patients from socio-economically deprived areas, enabling them to receive high-quality care towards the end of life. Patients are offered full holistic assessments and advance care planning, with 24/7 access to specialist palliative care support to avoid hospital transfer.
Background: Healthcare professionals and policy makers often view home as the most appropriate place of care and death for patients. However, this makes assumptions about what home is like and does not account for high levels of complexity experienced by patients from areas of high socioeconomic deprivation. Alternative models of care should be explored to provide equitable care for this patient group. Aims: To describe the development of a new innovative model of care, a long-term palliative care unit. Design: Description of the model, with secondary analysis of retrospective routinely gathered data. Setting: Hartlepool in North-East England, includes some of the most socio-economically deprived areas in England, with associated high-levels of multimorbidity. In 2014, the eight-bedded hospice, opened an additional 10-bedded long-term unit. Results: Within 7 years, 199 patients were admitted to the long-term unit. With 98% remained there until death. All patients were offered a full holistic assessment and advance care planning, with 24/7 access to specialist palliative care support. None were transferred to hospital. In general, patients from socio-economically deprived areas are less likely to access hospice care, however, 27% of all admissions to the long-term unit were from areas in the 10% most deprived in England (with 41% admitted from areas in the poorest quintile). Conclusion: We suggest that this model has been a valuable asset in providing an alternative place to home, enabling patients to receive high-quality care towards end of life. Further research is needed to hear directly from patients about their experiences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据