4.5 Article

Insight into MAPb1-xEuxI3 based perovskite solar cell performance using SCAPS Simulator

期刊

OPTIK
卷 271, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2022.170235

关键词

Perovskite solar cells; SCAPS-1D; MAPb(1-x)Eu(x)I(3); Hole transport layer; PCE

类别

资金

  1. Moroccan Ministry of Higher Education and Research
  2. CNRST [PPR/37/2015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the performance of organic/inorganic Perovskite Solar Cells (PSC) by using Europium instead of some lead atoms, and optimized the parameters of the hole transport layer. The results show a high power conversion efficiency (PCE) value.
The organic/inorganic Perovskite Solar Cells (PSC) are considered promising devices thanks to their higher efficiency, which made them a broad field of several studies, especially methyl-ammonium lead iodide solar cells, However, the presence of lead, high toxicity, and low stability are the main obstacles in front of the commercialization of these devices. Herein, the one-dimensional SCAPS-1D numerical simulator model has been used to investigate the performance of PSC, using the Europium (Eu) instead of some Pb atoms to reduce undesirable effects, which give (MAPb(1-x)Eu(x)I(3)) as absorber layer. Therefore, to enhance the performance parameters of the device and to achieve a higher power conversion efficiency (PCE) value compared to those existing in the literature, the study of the thickness effect and the active layer defects, using different Hole Transport Layer (HTL): NiOx, PEDOT : PSS, Spiro-OMeTAD, Cu2O was performed. In addition, the optimization of HTL parameters by varying the thickness and the concentration of the shallow acceptor was carried out. This Results show that the Cu2O as HTL with a thickness of 10 nm and concentration of the shallow acceptor of 10(16) cm(-3), combined with MAPb(1-x)Eu(x)I(3) active layers with a thickness of 289.5 nm and defect concentration of 10(14) cm(-3) gives the best PCE with a value of 21.72%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据