4.6 Article

Spatial and axial resolution limits for mask-based lensless cameras

期刊

OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 31, 期 2, 页码 2538-2551

出版社

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/OE.480025

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One of the challenges in lensless imaging is understanding their resolution capabilities in three dimensional scenes. This paper provides a theoretical framework for analyzing the achievable spatio-axial resolution by studying a generalized mask-based lensless camera. The analysis shows that the z-stacked measurements obtained from moving the sensor relative to an attenuating mask are related to the scene's volumetric albedo function through a three-dimensional convolutional operator. The results provide an upper bound for the performance of previously-studied lensless systems.
One of the open challenges in lensless imaging is understanding how well they resolve scenes in three dimensions. The measurement model underlying prior lensless imagers lacks special structures that facilitate deeper analysis; thus, a theoretical study of the achievable spatio-axial resolution has been lacking. This paper provides such a theoretical framework by analyzing a generalization of a mask-based lensless camera, where the sensor captures z-stacked measurements acquired by moving the sensor relative to an attenuating mask. We show that the z-stacked measurements are related to the scene's volumetric albedo function via a three-dimensional convolutional operator. The specifics of this convolution, and its Fourier transform, allow us to fully characterize the spatial and axial resolving power of the camera, including its dependence on the mask. Since z-stacked measurements are a superset of those made by previously-studied lensless systems, these results provide an upper bound for their performance. We numerically evaluate the theory and its implications using simulations. (c) 2023 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据