4.6 Article

Solution-processed ZnO nanoparticles (NPs)/CH3NH3PbI3/PTB7/MoO3/Ag inverted structure based UV-visible-Near Infrared (NIR) broadband photodetector

期刊

OPTICAL MATERIALS
卷 135, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.optmat.2022.113290

关键词

CH 3 NH 3 PbI 3; EQE; Perovskite; Photodetector; PTB7; UV-visible-NIR; ZnO NPs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents an inverted structure UV-visible-Near Infrared (NIR) broadband photodetector featuring ZnO Nanoparticles (NPs)/CH3NH3PbI3/PTB7/MoO3/Ag. The ZnO NPs layer serves as the electron transport layer (ETL), CH3NH3PbI3 functions as the active layer, PTB7 acts as the hole transport layer (HTL), and MoO3 is utilized to optimize the recombination current in the photodetector structure. The proposed device exhibits desirable optical and electrical characteristics, with a maximum photoresponsivity of -0.36 A/W, detectivity of -7.8x1012 Jones, and external quantum efficiency (EQE) of -83.67% under a bias voltage of -2 V. The rise time and fall time are measured as 81 ms and 75 ms, respectively.
This paper reports a ZnO Nanoparticles (NPs)/CH3NH3PbI3/PTB7/MoO3/Ag inverted structure based UV-vi-sible-Near Infrared (NIR) broadband photodetector fabricated on the fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) coated glass substrate. ZnO NPs layer acts as the electron transport layer (ETL), CH3NH3PbI3 acts as the active layer, PTB7 acts as the hole transport layer (HTL) and MoO3 is used to optimize the recombination current in the proposed photodetector structure. Spin coating method has been used for depositing the layers of ZnO NPs, CH3NH3PbI3 and PTB7 in the proposed structure while the MoO3 layer has been grown by the thermal evaporation method. The optical measurements over 350-850 nm wavelength range give the maximum photoresponsivity, detectivity and external quantum efficiency (EQE) of-0.36 A/W,-7.8x1012 Jones and-83.67% under-2 V, respectively. The proposed photodetector gives a rise time and fall time of 81 ms and 75 ms, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据