4.5 Article

Impedance stabilization by trigger modulation in copper vapor laser

期刊

OPTICAL AND QUANTUM ELECTRONICS
卷 55, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11082-022-04369-1

关键词

Discharge plasma; Pulse discharge; Pulse power supply; Impedance stabilization; Copper vapor laser

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents a novel approach to stabilize the laser's discharge plasma impedance by trigger modulation. The laser's impedance drops due to increased charge carriers during operation. By missing 0.1% of discharge pulse, the drop in voltage is improved from 4.3% to 2.3%, and the increase in current is limited to 3% from 3.6% after 6 hours of operation. The optical output power decreased by 10% at the end of 6 hours. This method also reduces thermal loading and instability in the discharge plasma, improving stability and reducing jitter in metal vapor lasers.
A novel approach to stabilize the laser's discharge plasma impedance by trigger modulation is presented. The discharge plasma impedance of laser drops due to increased charge carriers during laser operation. The absence of intermittent high voltage discharge pulses provides enhanced time for recombining charge carriers, thus restricting the fall in the laser impedance. It has been observed that by missing 0.1% of discharge pulse, the drop in the laser voltage is improved from 4.3 to 2.3%, and an increase in the laser head current is limited to 3% from 3.6% in 6 h of laser operation. The drop in the optical output power is reduced by 10% at the end of 6 h. Further, the controlled intermittent discharge missing ceases the thermal loading at the cathode fall and lowers the probability of thermal instability in discharge plasma. This will improve the discharge stability and reduces the jitter in the metal vapor laser. We believe this approach of manipulating trigger to attain stable impedance and prevent instability, can be applied to other applications requiring high current large volume stable discharges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据