4.8 Article

Therapeutic targeting the oncogenic driver EWSR1::FLI1 in Ewing sarcoma through inhibition of the FACT complex

期刊

ONCOGENE
卷 42, 期 1, 页码 11-25

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41388-022-02533-1

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study identifies SSRP1 as a crucial gene that is directly induced by EWSR1::FLI1 and forms an oncogenic positive feedback loop with it, promoting EwS oncogenesis. The FACT inhibitor CBL0137 effectively disrupts this loop, providing a novel therapeutic strategy for treating EwS.
EWS/ETS fusion transcription factors, most commonly EWSR1::FLI1, drives initiation and progression of Ewing sarcoma (EwS). Even though direct targeting EWSR1::FLI1 is a formidable challenge, epigenetic/transcriptional modulators have been proved to be promising therapeutic targets for indirectly disrupting its expression and/or function. Here, we identified structure-specific recognition protein 1 (SSRP1), a subunit of the Facilitates Chromatin Transcription (FACT) complex, to be an essential tumor-dependent gene directly induced by EWSR1::FLI1 in EwS. The FACT-targeted drug CBL0137 exhibits potent therapeutic efficacy against multiple EwS preclinical models both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, SSRP1 and EWSR1::FLI1 form oncogenic positive feedback loop via mutual transcriptional regulation and activation, and cooperatively promote cell cycle/DNA replication process and IGF1R-PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway to drive EwS oncogenesis. The FACT inhibitor drug CBL0137 effectively targets the EWSR1::FLI1-FACT circuit, resulting in transcriptional disruption of EWSR1::FLI1, SSRP1 and their downstream effector oncogenic signatures. Our study illustrates a crucial role of the FACT complex in facilitating the expression and function of EWSR1::FLI1 and demonstrates FACT inhibition as a novel and effective epigenetic/transcriptional-targeted therapeutic strategy against EwS, providing preclinical support for adding EwS to CBL0137's future clinical trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据