4.7 Article

Simplified operational guidance for second generation intact stability criteria

期刊

OCEAN ENGINEERING
卷 270, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113583

关键词

IMO Operational guidance; Second generation intact stability criteria; Parametric Roll; Pure Loss of Stability; Surf-riding/Broaching; Excessive Acceleration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The SGISC has been developed to address dangerous dynamic phenomena in waves. Five failure modes are defined, and a multi-layered structure is adopted to check the vulnerability of ships against each phenomenon. Operational Measures are provided to reduce stability failures. This study provides an overview of Operational Measures and focuses on the application of the Simplified Operational Guidance (OG) for different vulnerable ships.
The SGISC have been developed to account for dangerous dynamic phenomena in waves. Five failure modes are defined, and a multi-layered structure, consisting of vulnerability criteria and Direct Stability Assessment, is adopted to check the ship vulnerability against each phenomenon. If the ship does not comply with one or more criteria, Operational Measures can be provided to reduce the likelihood of stability failures.The present paper provides an overview of Operational Measures and focuses on the application of the Simplified Operational Guidance (OG) for four different ships, each vulnerable to at least one of the failure modes. OG are derived according to IMO Interim Guidelines, by limiting ships' operation in terms of sailing conditions. The original contribution of this work is the development and application of simple procedures to account for the effect of heading variations, leading to less conservative results in the evaluation of sailing conditions to be avoided.Results are presented in tabular form, reporting the critical speed for which the ship is vulnerable in defined headings, and in polar diagrams, identifying safe sailing conditions for given sea states.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据