4.7 Article

Residents? preference for the management of green tides and its determinants: The evidence from Qingdao, China

期刊

OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 233, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106445

关键词

Stated preference; Self-identity; Information concern; Green tides

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Green tides in China have become a serious and recurrent environmental issue, causing harm to the marine ecological environment. This study investigates residents' willingness to pay for the governance of green tides. The results show that residents are willing to pay an average of 68.59 CNY/year (US $9.85) for the complete disappearance of green tides and the restoration of the coastal environment.
Green tides, which cause serious harm to the marine ecological environment, have become a serious and recurrent environmental event in China. This paper investigates the residents' willingness to pay for the governance of green tides. The results show that residents' willingness to pay (WTP) for the complete disap-pearance of green tides and the restoration of coastal environment to the state before green tides reaches 68.59 CNY/a (US $ 9.85) on average. Additionally, the study uses self-identity and information concern to reflect the differences of residents' intrinsic characteristics and the onslaught of the extrinsic information to empirically analyze the sources of the preference differentials. Risk perception, moral norms, and self-efficacy are further introduced to observe the influence mechanism. The results indicate that moral norms are the most important factors affecting the WTP, and a direct relationship between information concern and residents' WTP is observed. Self-identity does not show a direct impact on residents' preference, however, has an indirect influence through moral norms and self-efficacy. This paper helps to increase individual pro-environmental behaviors and provides references for the management of green tides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据