4.4 Article

Persistent and De Novo GERD After Sleeve Gastrectomy: Manometric and pH-Impedance Study Findings

期刊

OBESITY SURGERY
卷 33, 期 1, 页码 87-93

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-022-06126-5

关键词

Bariatric surgery; Gastrectomy; Gastroesophageal reflux; GERD; Manometry; Esophageal pH monitoring

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that sleeve gastrectomy (SG) surgery in obese patients is associated with an increased risk of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and a higher rate of esophageal dysmotility.
Purpose One concerning disadvantage of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) technique as a treatment for obesity is the risk of developing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or worsening its symptoms after surgery. The purpose of this study is to describe the changes in manometry and 24-h pHmetry with impedance in bariatric patients after SG. Materials and Methods Retrospective analysis of 225 patients who underwent SG and were subjected to manometry, 24-h phmetry, and 24-h impedance between 2006 and 2016. Patients were subdivided into groups based on the test performed: 66 patients with manometry, 60 with 24-h pHmetry and 53 with 24-h impedance. Descriptive and analytical statistics were used for analysis. Results Manometry results showed a decrease in LES pressure from 12.26 +/- 6.87 to 8.88 +/- 6.28 mmHg in patients after surgery, de novo LES incompetence in 53.33%, worsening of symptoms in 71.4%, increase of inverted gastroesophageal gradient from 6.06% to 48.48% (p<0.05), and a rise in esophageal dysmotility from 18.19% to 37.87%. 24-h pHmetry showed an increase of DeMeester score from 16.71 +/- 12.78 to 42.88 +/- 32.08 after SG and 79.48% of de novo GERD. Ambulatory 24-h impedance showed an increase of pathological reflux from 47.17% to 88.67% postoperatively. Conclusions Laparoscopic SG is associated with a higher proportion of abnormal DeMeester score and greater incompetence of the LES in post-SG esophageal tests. Hence, SG may predispose the development of gastroesophageal reflux in the postoperative period.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据