4.7 Article

Disparities in weight changes during the COVID-19 pandemic-related lockdown in youths

期刊

OBESITY
卷 31, 期 3, 页码 789-801

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/oby.23645

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates whether changes in weight among school-aged youth in California due to the COVID-19 lockdown vary by social constructs of race/ethnicity and associated social factors. The study found that excess pandemic weight gain was higher among Black and Hispanic youth compared to White and Asian youth, particularly in the 5 to 11-year-old age group. The excess weight gain was also higher in youth with fewer neighborhood parks and those with state-subsidized health insurance.
ObjectiveThis study evaluates whether changes in weight among school-aged youth in California due to the COVID-19 lockdown vary by social constructs of race/ethnicity and associated social factors. MethodsIncluding 160,472 youth aged 5 to 17 years enrolled at Kaiser Permanente Southern California, mixed effects models stratified by age group were fitted to estimate changes in distance from the median BMI-for-age from March 2020 to January 2021 (lockdown) compared with the same period before the pandemic. ResultsExcess pandemic weight gain was higher among Black and Hispanic youth aged 5 to 17 years than among White and Asian youth; this difference was most pronounced in those aged 5 to 11 years. In youth aged 5 to 11 years, the distance from the median BMI-for-age increased by 1.72 kg/m(2) (95% CI: 1.61-1.84) in Hispanic and 1.70 kg/m(2) (95% CI: 1.47-1.94) in Black youth during the lockdown compared with 1.16 kg/m(2) (95% CI: 1.02-1.29) in non-Hispanic White youth. The excess weight gain was also higher in youth with fewer neighborhood parks and those with state-subsidized health insurance. ConclusionsThe COVID-19 pandemic lockdown led to a gain of excess body weight, particularly for Black and Hispanic youth; this weight gain varied by social factors associated with race and ethnicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据