4.4 Article

Effect of acidifying amendments on P availability in calcareous soils

期刊

NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS
卷 124, 期 2, 页码 247-262

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10705-022-10241-1

关键词

Calcareous soils; Mono-ammonium phosphate; Phosphorus availability; Soil acidifying amendments

资金

  1. University of Adelaide
  2. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
  3. Grains Research and Development Corporation [CSP2009-003RTX]
  4. CAUL and its Member Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to improve the efficiency of phosphorus in calcareous soils by applying soil acidifying amendments. The results showed that the acidifying amendments increased phosphorus solubility in soil but did not improve phosphorus fertiliser uptake in wheat crops.
Phosphorus (P) reactions in calcareous soils limit the concentration of P in the soil solution for plant uptake. Calcareous soils with high calcium carbonate content (CaCO3) and high pH have low P fertiliser efficiency, leading to crop deficiency and limited crop productivity. The aim of this work was to test if soil acidifying amendments could reduce soil pH and improve the solubility of fertiliser P to improve crop P nutrition and biomass. Three calcareous soils with varying CaCO3 content (14-29% w/w) were used to test acidifying amendments both with and without mono-ammonium phosphate (MAP). Soil was amended with oxalic acid, sulfuric acid, glucose, ammonium sulfate and elemental sulfur (S-0). Initial titrations demonstrated the ability of oxalic and sulfuric acids to reduce pH and improve P solubility in all three soils. Incubation of the acidifying amendments in the soil with the lowest carbonate content over 14 days (52 days for S-0) showed increased P solubility and diffusion from MAP granules in soil amended with glucose, sulfuric acid and oxalic acid. There was, however, no improvement in P fertiliser uptake in wheat crops grown in these highly calcareous soils.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据