4.6 Review

Co-design and delivery of a relational learning programme for nursing students and young people with severe and complex learning disabilities

期刊

NURSE EDUCATION TODAY
卷 119, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105548

关键词

Nursing education; Relational learning; Social justice; Multidisciplinary; Intellectual learning disability; Service user involvement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study describes a program co-designed by a university and a special school for nursing students and young people with severe and complex ILDs. Through arts and drama activities, participants experienced challenging, creative, and reflective transformations. The program helped nursing students learn how to establish relationships with patients and parents, reducing fears and anxieties between them.
Background: National Health Service (NHS) staff in the UK are required to undergo training about learning disabilities at the appropriate level for their role. However, this requirement does not apply to nurses in training and student nurses report fear and anxiety about caring for people with intellectual learning disabilities (ILDs). Young people with intellectual disabilities report feeling scared of nurses and parents feel staff do not listen to them or involve them in care.Objectives: (i) For a university and special school for young people with server and complex ILDs to work in partnership to co-design a programme for nursing students, young people, their teachers, and parents. (ii) To deliver the programme online as part of the university's existing nursing courses.Design: The partnership between the university and the special school focused on co-design of an interactive programme, parent involvement, safeguarding, and the design of accessible learning resources to support young people with severe and complex ILDs' engagement. The programme was informed by relational inquiry, service user and transformative pedagogies, and parents and teacher's knowledge and views about the young people. Delivery of the programme was designed to fit into existing nursing courses and enable students on placement and young people at home or in hospital to participate. A rights-based ethnographic evaluation was designed to support participant feedback and programme development.Setting: The Heritage2Health Virtual Arts and Drama Programme was piloted with nursing students at one UK university and young people with severe and complex ILDs from one special school, their parents and teachers. Participants: 15 nursing students (BSc Year 2 = 10, Year 3 = 3, MSc = 2) and 7 young people with severe and complex learning disabilities (age 11-14 yrs). Other participants were parents/guardians of young people (7), arts/drama facilitators (2), academic lecturers (2), special needs teachers (2), registered nurse (1). Methods: An 8-week dynamic programme of arts and drama. Sessions included 30-min start-up/presencing, 45min storytelling/drama with young people and parents, 30-min reflection/close. Sessions were facilitated by 2 arts and drama specialists. The story of 'Ubuntu the Lion with the Long, Long, Mane' (by TNP) was used to explore difference and ways of being. The evaluation methods were participant observation, semi-structured interviews (2-6 weeks post) and thematic analysis.Results: Participation in the programme was a challenging, creative, and reflective experience that was transformative for all. Nurses and young people's fears and anxieties about each other were revealed and addressed by participating in arts and drama activities together. Nursing students learnt how to adopt a relational orientation to young people and their parents and teachers.Conclusions: A co-designed programme for nursing students and young people with severe and complex ILDs can benefit student knowledge and skills and reduce fears and anxieties between nurses and young people with ILDs.With adequate planning and resources, the programme could be adopted by multidisciplinary partnerships be-tween other universities and special schools.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据