4.8 Article

The hnRNP C tetramer binds to CBC on mRNA and impedes PHAX recruitment for the classification of RNA polymerase II transcripts

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 51, 期 3, 页码 1393-1408

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac1250

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In eukaryotic cells, different classes of RNAs are exported to the cytoplasm by specific factors. Previous studies have shown that RNA polymerase II transcripts are classified based on their length, and hnRNP C is a key factor in this classification process. hnRNP C inhibits the recruitment of PHAX to long transcripts, but the mechanisms behind this inhibition are still unknown.
In eukaryotic cells, various classes of RNAs are exported to the cytoplasm by class-specific factors. Accumulating evidence has shown that export factors affect the fate of RNA, demonstrating the importance of proper RNA classification upon export. We previously reported that RNA polymerase II transcripts were classified after synthesis depending on their length, and identified heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) C as the key classification factor. HnRNP C inhibits the recruitment of PHAX, an adapter protein for spliceosomal U snRNA export, to long transcripts, navigating these RNAs to the mRNA export pathway. However, the mechanisms by which hnRNP C inhibits PHAX recruitment to mRNA remain unknown. We showed that the cap-binding complex, a bridging factor between m(7)G-capped RNA and PHAX, directly interacted with hnRNP C on mRNA. Additionally, we revealed that the tetramer-forming activity of hnRNP C and its strong RNA-binding activity were crucial for the inhibition of PHAX binding to longer RNAs. These results suggest that mRNA is wrapped around the hnRNP C tetramer without a gap from the cap, thereby impeding the recruitment of PHAX. The results obtained on the mode of length-specific RNA classification by the hnRNP C tetramer will provide mechanistic insights into hnRNP C-mediated RNA biogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据