4.8 Article

MIBiG 3.0: a community-driven effort to annotate experimentally validated biosynthetic gene clusters

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 51, 期 D1, 页码 D603-D610

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac1049

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the increasing amount of genomic data, (meta)genome mining plays a critical role in discovering pharmaceutical drugs and other materials. MIBiG is a standardized data format and online database for describing and characterizing biosynthetic gene clusters. MIBiG 3.0 is an update of the database that includes validation, re-annotation, and new entries.
With an ever-increasing amount of (meta)genomic data being deposited in sequence databases, (meta)genome mining for natural product biosynthetic pathways occupies a critical role in the discovery of novel pharmaceutical drugs, crop protection agents and biomaterials. The genes that encode these pathways are often organised into biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs). In 2015, we defined the Minimum Information about a Biosynthetic Gene cluster (MIBiG): a standardised data format that describes the minimally required information to uniquely characterise a BGC. We simultaneously constructed an accompanying online database of BGCs, which has since been widely used by the community as a reference dataset for BGCs and was expanded to 2021 entries in 2019 (MIBiG 2.0). Here, we describe MIBiG 3.0, a database update comprising large-scale validation and re-annotation of existing entries and 661 new entries. Particular attention was paid to the annotation of compound structures and biological activities, as well as protein domain selectivities. Together, these new features keep the database upto-date, and will provide new opportunities for the scientific community to use its freely available data, e.g. for the training of new machine learning models to predict sequence-structure-function relationships for diverse natural products. MIBiG 3.0 is accessible online at https://mibig.secondarymetabolites.org/. [GRAPHICS] .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据