4.5 Article

Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5-year follow-up from the prospective multicenter Quality Outcomes Database registry

相关参考文献

注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Article Clinical Neurology

Ten-Year Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients With Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Ji-Won Kwon et al.

Summary: This retrospective observational study compared the long-term clinical and radiological results of minimally invasive (MI) and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in patients with single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis. The study found no significant differences in outcomes between MI-TLIF and open TLIF over a 10-year period. However, MI-TLIF may have superior perioperative recovery and 2-year postoperative functional outcomes compared to open TLIF.
Article Clinical Neurology

Comparison of local and regional radiographic outcomes in minimally invasive and open TLIF: a propensity score-matched cohort

Christopher F. Dibble et al.

Summary: This study compared the effects of minimally invasive and open lumbar fusion surgeries on local and regional radiographic parameters. The results showed that both surgical approaches led to significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes and local radiographic parameters, with no significant effects on regional alignment. Minimally invasive fusion surgery may have better correction effects in certain measures.

JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE (2022)

Article Clinical Neurology

Patient-reported outcome improvements at 24-month follow-up after fusion added to decompression for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a multicenter study using the Quality Outcomes Database

Erica F. Bisson et al.

Summary: The study analyzed 608 patients with grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis and found that fusion surgery combined with decompression may lead to superior outcomes at 24 months compared to decompression alone, in terms of reducing disability and achieving clinically significant improvements. Further long-term follow-up is needed to confirm the sustainability of these findings.

JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE (2021)

Review Clinical Neurology

Long-term clinical outcome of minimally invasive versus open single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis

Johan L. Heemskerk et al.

Summary: After analyzing 16 studies, it was found that MIS-TLIF and open-TLIF have comparable long-term clinical outcomes. Both surgeries significantly reduce pain and improve PROMs, with no significant differences between the two treatments at a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

SPINE JOURNAL (2021)

Article Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology

Standard versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Randomized Study

Daniel Serban et al.

BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL (2017)

Article Clinical Neurology

Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison between Open and Mini-Open Approaches with Two Years Follow-Up

F. Zairi et al.

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART A-CENTRAL EUROPEAN NEUROSURGERY (2013)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis

James N. Weinstein et al.

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2007)