4.7 Article

Novel developments in non-contrast enhanced MRI of the perivascular clearance system: What are the possibilities for Alzheimer?s disease research?

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104999

关键词

Cerebral waste clearance; Non-contrast enhanced MRI; Glymphatic; Intramural periarterial drainage; Cognitive decline; Dementia; Alzheimer ?s disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The waste clearance system in the brain plays a role in Alzheimer's disease through the aggregation of Amyloid-beta. MRI techniques have potential for studying this system, especially non-contrast enhanced techniques. This review discusses recent advancements in non-CE MRI techniques and their application in studying the physiological aspects of the clearance system and its dysfunction in cognitive decline and AD.
The cerebral waste clearance system (i.e, glymphatic or intramural periarterial drainage) works through a network of perivascular spaces (PVS). Dysfunction of this system likely contributes to aggregation of Amyloid-beta and subsequent toxic plaques in Alzheimer's disease (AD). A promising, non-invasive technique to study this system is MRI, though applications in dementia are still scarce. This review focusses on recent non-contrast enhanced (non-CE) MRI techniques which determine and visualise physiological aspects of the clearance system at multiple levels, i.e., cerebrospinal fluid flow, PVS-flow and interstitial fluid movement. Furthermore, various MRI studies focussing on aspects of the clearance system which are relevant to AD are discussed, such as studies on ageing, sleep alterations, and cognitive decline. Additionally, the complementary function of non-CE to CE methods is elaborated upon. We conclude that non-CE studies have great potential to determine which parts of the waste clearance system are affected by AD and in which stages of cognitive impairment dysfunction of this system occurs, which could allow future clinical trials to target these specific mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据