4.6 Article

Probing the Electronic Structure and Chemical Bonding of Mono-Uranium Oxides with Different Oxidation States: UOx- and UOx (x=3-5)

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
卷 120, 期 7, 页码 1084-1096

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.5b11354

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0006979]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Biological and Environmental Research and located at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
  3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0006979] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Uranium oxide clusters UOx- (x = 3-5) were produced by laser vaporization and characterized by photoelectron spectroscopy and quantum theory. Photoelectron spectra were obtained for UOx- at various photon energies with well-resolved detachment transitions and vibrational resolution for x = 3 and 4. The electron affinities of UOx were measured as 1.12, 3.60, and 4.02 eV for x = 3, 4, and 5, respectively. The geometric and electronic structures of both the anions and the corresponding neutrals were investigated by quasi-relativistic electron-correlation quantum theory to interpret the photoelectron spectra and to provide insight into their chemical bonding. For UOx clusters with x <= 3, the O atoms appear as divalent closed-shell anions around the U atom, which is in various oxidation states from U-II(fds)(4) in UO to U-VI(fds)(0) in UO3. For x > 3, there are no longer sufficient valence electrons from the U atom to fill the O(2p) shell, resulting in fractionally charged and multicenter delocalized valence states for the O ligands as well as eta(1)- or eta(2)-bonded O-2 units, with unusual spin couplings and complicated electron correlations in the unfilled poly oxo shell. The present work expands our understanding of both the bonding capacities of actinide elements with extended spdf valence shells as well as the multitude of oxygen's charge and bonding states.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据