4.7 Review

Role of PACAP in migraine: An alternative to CGRP?

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF DISEASE
卷 176, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2022.105946

关键词

PACAP; CGRP; Migraine; Drug target; cAMP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Migraine is a widespread and debilitating neurological condition affecting more than a billion people worldwide. The recent introduction of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) blocking the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) has been a significant advance in migraine therapy. However, a large proportion of patients are unresponsive to these new drugs, and it is believed that the pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP) pathway may be involved in these cases.
Migraine is a widespread and debilitating neurological condition affecting more than a billion people worldwide. Thus, more effective migraine therapies are highly needed. In the last decade, two endogenous neuropeptides, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP), were identified to be implicated in migraine. Recently, introduction of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) blocking the CGRP is the most important advance in migraine therapy for decades. However, 40% of patients are unresponsive to these new drugs. We believe that PACAP may be involved in these patients. Like CGRP, PACAP is located to sensory nerve fibers, it dilates cranial arteries, it causes migraine when infused into patients and it is a peptide that lends itself to antibody therapy. Also, recent studies suggest that the PACAP pathway is independent of the CGRP pathway. Understanding the signaling pathways of PACAP may therefore lead to identification of novel therapeutic targets of particular interest in patients unresponsive to anti-CGRP therapy. Accordingly, neutralizing mAb to PACAP is currently in clinical phase II development. The aim of the present review is, therefore, to give a thorough account of the existing data on PACAP, its receptors and its relation to migraine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据