4.3 Article

Oral Ibuprofen Is More Effective than Intravenous Ibuprofen for Closure of a Patent Ductus Arteriosus: Can Pharmacokinetic Modeling Help Us to Understand Why?

期刊

NEONATOLOGY
卷 120, 期 1, 页码 81-89

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000526210

关键词

Pharmacokinetics; Ibuprofen; Neonates; Patent ductus arteriosus; Pharmacology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the mechanism behind the greater effectiveness of oral ibuprofen compared to intravenous ibuprofen in closing a patent ductus arteriosus. The results show that after oral dosing, the concentration of the biologically active S-enantiomer is lower for a significant portion of the dosing interval. The study also indicates that R- to S-conversion does not exceed 45%.
Introduction: Oral ibuprofen is more effective than intravenous (IV) ibuprofen for closure of a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). This study explored whether higher concentrations of the biologically active S-enantiomer or increased R- to S-conversion following oral dosing could explain this finding. Methods: Two datasets containing 370 S- and R-ibuprofen concentrations from 95 neonates with PDA treated with oral (n = 27, 28%) or IV ibuprofen were analyzed using nonlinear mixed effects modeling. Concentration-time profiles in typical neonates were explored and compared in different dosing or R- to S-conversion scenarios. Results: Postnatal age (PNA), gestational age (GA), and being small for GA impacted S- and R-ibuprofen clearance. Upon oral dosing, S-ibuprofen concentrations were lower compared to IV ibuprofen for a large part of the dosing interval. We could show that R- to Sconversion will not exceed 45%. Exploration of a 30% presystemic R- to S-conversion resulted in a 25-32% increase in S-ibuprofen exposure following oral administration with AUC(72h) values varying between 700-2,213 mg*h/L (oral) and 531-1,762 (IV) for the standard or 1,704-2,893 (oral) and 1,295-2,271 mg*h/L (IV) for PNA-based dosing. Discussion: The absence of higher S-ibuprofen concentrations does not support a beneficial concentration-time profile after oral dosing. While a fraction of up to 45% presystemic R- to S-conversion could not be ruled out, the impact of such a low conversion might be only relevant for the standard but not high dosing regimens, considering reported exposure-response targets. Perhaps, the lack of high peak concentrations observed following IV dosing may play a role in the observed effects upon oral dosing. 1.% 2022 The Author(s).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据