4.8 Article

Architecture of chloroplast TOC-TIC translocon supercomplex

期刊

NATURE
卷 615, 期 7951, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-05744-y

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chloroplasts import nuclear-encoded proteins using translocon complexes in the outer and inner envelope membranes. The structure of the TOC-TIC supercomplex from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii has been determined, revealing the overall architecture and protein organization. The presence of an inositol hexaphosphate molecule and lipid molecules within the supercomplex suggests their role in stabilizing the assembly and supporting preprotein translocation.
Chloroplasts rely on the translocon complexes in the outer and inner envelope membranes (the TOC and TIC complexes, respectively) to import thousands of different nuclear-encoded proteins from the cytosol(1-4). Although previous studies indicated that the TOC and TIC complexes may assemble into larger supercomplexes(5-7), the overall architectures of the TOC-TIC supercomplexes and the mechanism of preprotein translocation are unclear. Here we report the cryo-electron microscopy structure of the TOC-TIC supercomplex from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. The major subunits of the TOC complex (Toc75, Toc90 and Toc34) and TIC complex (Tic214, Tic20, Tic100 and Tic56), three chloroplast translocon-associated proteins (Ctap3, Ctap4 and Ctap5) and three newly identified small inner-membrane proteins (Simp1-3) have been located in the supercomplex. As the largest protein, Tic214 traverses the inner membrane, the intermembrane space and the outer membrane, connecting the TOC complex with the TIC proteins. An inositol hexaphosphate molecule is located at the Tic214-Toc90 interface and stabilizes their assembly. Four lipid molecules are located within or above an inner-membrane funnel formed by Tic214, Tic20, Simp1 and Ctap5. Multiple potential pathways found in the TOC-TIC supercomplex may support translocation of different substrate preproteins into chloroplasts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据