4.4 Article

An integrative GC-MS and LC-MS metabolomics platform determination of the metabolite profile of Bombax ceiba L. root, and in silico & in vitro evaluation of its antibacterial & antidiabetic activities

期刊

NATURAL PRODUCT RESEARCH
卷 37, 期 13, 页码 2263-2268

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14786419.2022.2149519

关键词

Bombax ceiba L; asiatic acid; GC-MS analysis; lathodoratin; LC-MS analysis; cedrene

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Bombax ceiba L. tree has been extensively used in traditional Chinese and Indian medicine for treating illnesses. Its chemical composition remains unknown. This study identified twelve compounds from GC-MS analysis and six compounds from LC-MS analysis in the methanol extract of B. ceiba roots. The extract exhibited significant antibacterial activity and inhibition of enzyme activity, supporting its medicinal potential.
The Bombax ceiba L. tree is a member of the family Bombacaceae and the genus Bombax. Both Chinese and Indian traditional medicine have made extensive use of it in the treatment of sickness. Its chemical composition is still a mystery. B. ceiba roots methanol extract (BCRME) was analyzed by different chromatographic analytical techniques in order to identify its major chemical constituents. Twelve compounds and six compounds were identified from GC-MS and LC-MS analysis, respectively. This is the first report on the presence of lathodoratin, cedrene, 4H-1-benzopyran-4-one,8-[{dimethylamino} methyl]-7-methoxy-3-methyl-2-phenyl, asiatic acid, and (E)-2,4,4'-trihydroxylchalcone in B. ceiba roots. Methanol extract demonstrated noteworthy antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus (MTCC96) (MIC: 100 mu g/mL) compare to antibiotic ampicillin (MIC: 250 mu g/mL) as well as the highest alpha-amylase inhibition (IC50=26.91 mu g/mL) and alpha-glucosidase inhibition (IC50=21.21 mu g/mL) effects, molecular docking study confirmed these findings, with some compounds having a very high docking score.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据