4.6 Article

Using an inventory cluster approach for assessing bushfire preparedness and information needs in vulnerable communities

期刊

NATURAL HAZARDS
卷 115, 期 2, 页码 1697-1714

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-022-05614-2

关键词

Bushfire; Wildfire; Preparation; Preparedness; Communication; Community engagement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Preparation for natural hazards has been proven to reduce losses and improve disaster recovery. This study examined preparation activities in a bushfire-vulnerable area in Queensland, Australia, and identified weak areas in evacuation planning and safety planning. Emergency agencies and community engagement practitioners can use cluster-based research to improve messaging in bushfire preparation campaigns and encourage specific safety behaviors, thus enhancing the safety of people and property.
Disasters cost the world $US268bn in 2020 in economic, property and human losses. In Queensland, the most disaster-prone of Australian states, flood, cyclone and bushfire will cost $466bn over the next 40 years. Individual preparation for natural hazards has been shown to reduce this cost by reducing adverse experiences, physical health problems and post-traumatic stress, and improving the speed of disaster recovery. This study categorises preparation activity into clusters according to the activity's purpose in order to survey residents of a bushfire-vulnerable area in Queensland, Australia. This cluster approach enabled identification of specific areas of weakness in preparation plans, finding that evacuation planning activity, and safety planning activity were especially weak. These results show that emergency agency communicators and community engagement practitioners can use cluster-based research to better plan messaging within their bushfire preparation communication campaigns to target and motivate specific safety behaviours. Improved safety of people and property will mitigate the costs of bushfires in Queensland in future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据