4.8 Article

Control of the stepwise self-assembly process of a pH-responsive amphiphilic 4-aminoquinoline-tetraphenylethene conjugate

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 15, 期 7, 页码 3177-3187

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2nr05756e

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a new amphiphilic 4-aminoquinoline (4-AQ)-tetraphenylethene (TPE) conjugate was reported, which exhibited kinetically controllable stepwise self-assembly and the ability to switch its kinetic nature in response to pH. The self-assembly process of the 4-AQ amphiphile involved the formation of sphere-like nanoparticles, a transition to short nanofibers, and their growth to long nanofibers at room temperature. The time scale of the self-assembly process varied depending on the pH-responsiveness of the 4-AQ moiety.
Controlling the kinetic processes of self-assembly and switching their kinetic properties according to the changes in external environments are crucial concepts in the field of supramolecular polymers in water for biological and biomedical applications. Here we report a new self-assembling amphiphilic 4-aminoquinoline (4-AQ)-tetraphenylethene (TPE) conjugate that exhibits kinetically controllable stepwise self-assembly and has the ability of switching its kinetic nature in response to pH. The self-assembly process of the 4-AQ amphiphile comprises the formation of sphere-like nanoparticles, a transition to short nanofibers, and their growth to long nanofibers with similar to 1 mu m length scale at room temperature (RT). The timescale of the self-assembly process differs according to the pH-responsivity of the 4-AQ moiety in a weakly acidic to neutral pH range. Therefore, after aging for 24 h at RT, the 4-AQ amphiphile forms metastable short nanofibers at pH 5.5, while it forms thermodynamically favored long nanofibers at pH 7.4. Moreover, the modulation of nanofiber growth proceeding spontaneously at RT was achieved by switching the kinetic pathway through changing the pH between 7.4 and 5.5.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据