4.8 Article

High surface area siloxene for photothermal and electrochemical catalysis

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 154-161

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2nr05140k

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  3. U of T-ZJU Joint Seed Fund
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  5. State Key Laboratory of New Textile Materials and Advanced Processing Technologies
  6. [2021YFF0502000]
  7. [51902287]
  8. [61721005]
  9. [226-2022-00159]
  10. [226-2022-00200]
  11. [FZ2020020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a new solution to the substandard catalytic activity of two-dimensional silicon by synthesizing siloxene with an enhanced specific surface area and preparing a two-dimensional porous structure to support and disperse metal nanoparticles. Catalytic evaluations reveal that these hybrid structures outperform benchmark two-dimensional silicon structures in (photo)thermal CO2 hydrogenation and electrochemical hydrogen evolution reactions, indicating their considerable potential for advanced energy, catalytic, and environmental applications.
Catalysis based on two-dimensional silicon has been under intense investigation recently. However, its substandard catalytic activity is far from industrialization. In this work, we demonstrate a new solution to this problem formulated on the batch synthesis of siloxene with an enhanced specific surface area (217.8 m(2) g(-1)). A two-dimensional porous structure was prepared, enabling great support and dispersion of metal nanoparticles. Catalytic evaluations of such hybrid structures for the (photo)thermal CO2 hydrogenation reaction and the electrochemical hydrogen evolution reaction revealed a significant performance advantage over the benchmark two-dimensional silicon structures synthesized via the conventional method. This work may confer notable viability on two-dimensional silicon for advanced energy, catalytic, and environmental applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据