4.8 Article

Tuning the electron transport behavior at Li/LATP interface for enhanced cyclability of solid-state Li batteries

期刊

NANO RESEARCH
卷 16, 期 1, 页码 1634-1641

出版社

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-022-5136-2

关键词

solid-state electrolyte; Li metal; LiF; Al; electron transport; interfacial barrier

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The failure mechanism of ionic conductor interlayers, especially the influence from electron penetration, remains largely unknown. An Al-LiF bilayer is found to dramatically promote the interfacial stability between Li/LATP, providing potential for high-performance solid-state batteries.
An interlayer is usually employed to tackle the interfacial instability issue between solid electrolytes (SEs) and Li metal caused by the side reaction. However, the failure mechanism of the ionic conductor interlayers, especially the influence from electron penetration, remains largely unknown. Herein, using Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)(3) (LATP) as the model SE and LiF as the interlayer, we use metal semiconductor contact barrier theory to reveal the failure origin of Li/LiF@LATP interface based on the calculation results of density functional theory (DFT), in which electrons can easily tunnel through the LiF grain boundary with F vacancies due to its narrow barrier width against electron injection, followed by the reduction of LATP. Remarkably, an Al-LiF bilayer between Li/LATP is found to dramatically promote the interfacial stability, due to the highly increased barrier width and homogenized electric field at the interface. Consequently, the Li symmetric cells with Al-LiF bilayer can exhibit excellent cyclability of more than 2,000 h superior to that interlayered by LiF monolayer (similar to 860 h). Moreover, the Li/Al-LiF@LATP/LiFePO4 solid-state batteries deliver a capacity retention of 83.2% after 350 cycles at 0.5 C. Our findings emphasize the importance of tuning the electron transport behavior by optimizing the potential barrier for the interface design in high-performance solid-state batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据