4.8 Article

A Synergistic Interaction between Chk1-and MK2 Inhibitors in KRAS-Mutant Cancer

期刊

CELL
卷 162, 期 1, 页码 146-159

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.053

关键词

-

资金

  1. Volkswagenstiftung (Lichtenberg Program)
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [KFO-286, RE2246/2-1]
  3. Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft (Preclinical Comprehensive Cancer Center)
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim Foundation
  5. German Cancer Aid [DKH-111112]
  6. Federal Ministry for Research and Education (BMBF) [01ZX1303A]
  7. Else Kroner-Fresenius Stiftung [EKFS-2014-A06]
  8. Dietmar Hopp Foundation
  9. Danish Cancer Society
  10. Lundbeck Foundation [R93-A8990]
  11. Czech National Program of Sustainability [LO1304]
  12. Danish National Research Foundation
  13. Lundbeck Foundation [R93-2011-8990] Funding Source: researchfish
  14. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF12OC0002290] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

KRAS is one of the most frequently mutated oncogenes in human cancer. Despite substantial efforts, no clinically applicable strategy has yet been developed to effectively treat KRAS-mutant tumors. Here, we perform a cell-line-based screen and identify strong synergistic interactions between cell-cycle checkpoint-abrogating Chk1- and MK2 inhibitors, specifically in KRAS- and BRAF-driven cells. Mechanistically, we show that KRAS-mutant cancer displays intrinsic genotoxic stress, leading to tonic Chk1- and MK2 activity. We demonstrate that simultaneous Chk1- and MK2 inhibition leads to mitotic catastrophe in KRAS-mutant cells. This actionable synergistic interaction is validated using xenograft models, as well as distinct Kras- or Braf-driven autochthonous murine cancer models. Lastly, we show that combined checkpoint inhibition induces apoptotic cell death in KRAS- or BRAF-mutant tumor cells directly isolated from patients. These results strongly recommend simultaneous Chk1- and MK2 inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for the treatment of KRAS- or BRAF-driven cancers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据